Stock is missing. Invoices do not look right. A supplier appears connected to an employee. Confidential information has reached someone outside the business. These are warning signs, not proof. A careful investigation helps the organisation understand what has happened before it accuses anyone or starts formal action.
Our corporate fraud investigation in London and employee misconduct investigation service combines internal theft, stock loss, undisclosed conflicts, information leaks and other concerns involving people inside or connected to the business. Keeping them together allows the investigation to follow the evidence instead of being restricted by a service label.
You are not committing to anything by contacting us.
We can examine people, companies, addresses, suppliers and public records to look for connections that were not disclosed. This may help with suspected false invoices, supplier fraud, conflicts of interest, diversion of goods or a business being used to hide activity.
A connection is not automatically proof of fraud. The report explains what the link is and what further records, interviews or professional accountancy work may be needed.
Internal concerns may involve stolen goods, cash, time, expenses, customer information, company property or unauthorised outside work. We look at the dates, access, shifts and incident pattern to identify the strongest questions. This helps avoid placing an entire workforce under suspicion.
Possible methods include company research, reviewing records supplied by the client, witness enquiries, planned interviews or surveillance during a defined period. The method depends on the concern; surveillance is not automatically required.
When confidential material appears outside the organisation, the most obvious person is not always responsible. We can help map who had access, when the information was shared, which outside organisations were connected and what other routes may explain the leak.
Checking company devices, recovering emails or examining computer systems requires proper authority and a qualified digital specialist. LPI can coordinate that part of the case but will not access a device or account without permission.
Secret monitoring of staff should only be considered in exceptional circumstances, such as a well-founded concern about serious wrongdoing where warning the person would damage the investigation. It is not a normal way to manage poor performance or minor workplace issues.
Before any covert monitoring, the business should involve its legal, HR and data-protection advisers, record why it is necessary, limit who and what is monitored, and set a clear end date. LPI will not deploy covert monitoring simply because it is easier than using the company’s normal procedures.
Speaking to witnesses or the person accused can be useful, but timing matters. Contacting someone too early may lead to evidence being deleted or stories being coordinated. We agree who should be approached, what can be disclosed and how the conversation will be recorded.
The report sets out the allegation, work completed, facts found, witness information, relevant company links and anything that remains unproven. For larger cases, it can show which points are supported, contradicted or still require further evidence. Management and its advisers then decide what action to take.
Corporate fraud investigations start from £1,250 + VAT for the first stage. Employee misconduct investigations start from £750 + VAT. Internal theft and stock-loss investigations start from £1,000 + VAT. Wider information-leak and insider-risk cases are priced after an initial discussion.
Usually not before protecting evidence and speaking with the appropriate legal or HR adviser. Acting too early can damage both the evidence and a fair process.
Not without proper permission and specialist handling. Device access should be considered by your legal and digital advisers.
It can record specific behaviour. The employer and its advisers decide what that behaviour means under company rules and employment law.
That decision normally belongs to the organisation and its legal advisers, unless there is an immediate danger or another clear duty to report.
Yes. A focused first stage often shows whether interviews, surveillance, accountancy or digital examination are worth the additional cost.
You will not be judged, pressured or rushed. Speak with an investigator, explain your concern, and we will tell you honestly whether an investigation would help.
All enquiries are handled privately and respectfully. You can contact us even if you are only seeking advice.